A proposed Missouri regulation aiming to ban regulation enforcement from buying drones manufactured in China, akin to DJI drones, has stirred controversy within the state capital. Senate Invoice 296 (SB 296), launched by Sen. Rick Brattin (R-Harrisonville), seeks to deal with nationwide safety considerations however has drawn sharp opposition from regulation enforcement and public security officers who depend upon Chinese language made drones. As detailed within the Columbia Missourian, the invoice’s listening to on March 3, 2025, uncovered a rift between safety advocates and people prioritizing operational wants.
On this article we’ll check out the technical and regulatory stakes of SB 296, its potential impression on Missouri’s public security sector, and its place throughout the ever altering drone expertise panorama.
Safety Considerations Driving SB 296
Sen. Brattin framed SB 296 as a safeguard towards overseas espionage, citing the Chinese language balloon noticed over the U.S. in 2023 and considerations tied to TikTok. “That is mainly the modern-day Malicious program,” he instructed the Senate Committee on Transportation, Infrastructure and Public Security, suggesting that Chinese language DJI drones might be exploited to gather delicate knowledge.
Whereas the article within the Columbia Missourian doesn’t specify which businesses again his stance, federal warnings from the FBI and Division of Protection have flagged potential dangers with Chinese language-made drones like these from DJI, the worldwide market chief.
DJI holds roughly 70% of the U.S. industrial drone market and over 80% of first-responder functions, per Bloomberg estimates, making it a chief goal for such laws.
Legislation Enforcement Pushes Again
Opposition surfaced shortly. John Yeast of the Legislation Enforcement Drone Affiliation argued that SB 296 displays lobbying by U.S. drone makers quite than real safety threats.
“This invoice just isn’t about Information Safety however lobbying efforts by home drone producers aiming to ban non-U.S. drones for monetary achieve,” he stated. This skepticism aligns with business critiques of comparable federal payments, just like the Countering CCP Drones Act.
Eric Schmitt, Branson’s Police chief, criticized the invoice’s grant program, supposed to offset substitute prices for banned drones. “The grant funding… wouldn’t suffice and would pressure communities to decide on both to violate the regulation so as to save lives or not take part,” he testified. The Columbia Missourian didn’t quantify the grants, however changing a $1,500 DJI drone with a $10,999 U.S.-made different underscores the monetary pressure.
John Barton, fireplace chief of Excessive Ridge Fireplace District, supplied a technical counterpoint. His group makes use of DJI drones however replaces the Chinese language software program with DroneSense, a Texas-based platform.
“The {hardware} is manufactured in China. That’s true,” Barton stated. “Nonetheless, we don’t use the software program launched by the Chinese language drone producer.”
He likened this to Apple, noting that 90% to 95% of its {hardware} is Chinese language-made but its software program stays American.
Technical Realities of Drone {Hardware} and Software program
The hardware-software break up is vital. DJI’s Mavic 3 Enterprise, extensively utilized by First Responders, weighs 2.3 kilos, presents 45 minutes of flight time, and retails for $3,600, per DJI’s specs. In contrast, Skydio‘s X2D, a U.S.-made possibility, weighs 2.9 kilos, flies for 35 minutes, and begins at $10,999, in keeping with Skydio. Barton’s DroneSense resolution encrypts knowledge and blocks overseas entry, a observe echoed by companies like Paladin Drones, which provides safe {hardware} to DJI items for knowledge safety.
Public Security Use Instances at Threat
Barton harassed sensible drone functions, like search-and-rescue and Wildfire monitoring, over non-sensitive areas. “We fly over areas… simply as seen from Google Maps,” he stated. The Columbia Missourian additionally cited examples from different officers, together with monitoring suspects and assessing disasters—makes use of detailed in Drones for Good protection. A ban might disrupt these missions, particularly in rural Missouri, the place drones cowl huge terrain on restricted budgets.
Market and Regulatory Context
SB 296 matches a nationwide sample. The U.S. Home’s Countering CCP Drones Act handed in 2024, and the 2025 NDAA could tighten restrictions additional, per Congressional data. James Harris of State Armor Motion supported SB 296, citing FBI warnings and arguing U.S. manufacturing might outpace China’s. But, home companies like Skydio battle to match DJI’s scale and pricing. The invoice permits waivers if U.S. options aren’t viable, however the course of might bathroom down adoption, significantly for cash-strapped businesses.
Conclusion: Balancing Safety and Utility
SB 296 highlights a conflict between safety fears and operational wants. Brattin’s “Malicious program” warning carries weight—knowledge dangers aren’t imaginary—however the invoice’s broad stroke ignores fixes like DroneSense. Legislation enforcement’s pushback suggests a deeper problem: U.S. drone makers want innovation, not mandates, to compete.
If SB 296 passes, Missouri businesses will scramble for replacements, testing the grant program’s limits. If it fails, software program patches could maintain the road. Both final result will ripple via the drone business, the place geopolitics more and more dictates expertise’s destiny.
DroneXL’s Take
Yeast’s lobbying critique hits the mark—SB 296 smells like a lift for U.S. companies lagging behind DJI. Punishing customers for a market failure isn’t progress. The true repair lies in funding American R&D to match China’s edge, not banning instruments that work. Missouri’s first responders want drones that ship, not a legislative standoff.
Uncover extra from DroneXL.co
Subscribe to get the most recent posts despatched to your electronic mail.
