The Galaxy S25 is yet one more product from the Korean tech large that has entry to some options from Google that different telephones do not but have. It isn’t the primary time this has occurred; we have seen it in earlier Galaxy telephone launches, and even the “new” Put on OS appears fully like a Samsung/Google joint effort. The partnership between the 2 has by no means been stronger.
I’ve seen just a few folks declare that that is ruining Android. I disagree and suppose, if something, that is much less of a partnership and extra like Google exploiting Samsung as a result of Samsung permits it.
Android & Chill
One of many internet’s longest-running tech columns, Android & Chill is your Saturday dialogue of Android, Google, and all issues tech.
I am not speaking about any type of web slap-fighting between overzealous however misguided model loyalists. Samsung did not promote unhealthy shows to different corporations or purposely promote exploding batteries to spoil the fame of the Android ecosystem. Frankly, that sort of pondering exhibits an individual has no thought how the smartphone business even works, and I steer clear of all of it. OnePlus bought thousands and thousands of telephones and a handful of them utilizing Samsung shows had a inexperienced line. Samsung bought thousands and thousands of Observe 7s, and 10 or so had essential battery points, prompting a recall. Nothing was intentional.
What I am speaking about and the place a lot of the dialogue about Android’s ruined fame stems from how intently the 2 corporations appear to work collectively to offer Samsung first entry, and even unique entry, to Google options.
It is a change to how Android began. Having one firm in a position to get Google software program when different corporations cannot is a slap within the face of Android’s “open” days. There was a time when Motorola and HTC had been atop the Android mountain and Samsung would have been displeased if Google gave both unique entry to options. Rightly so, thus I understand that to some folks this alteration has ruined Android.
The factor is that Android was by no means actually open and this is not Samsung’s doing. Blame Google if you’ll want to level the finger.
The Google/Samsung relationship is not equal, and that’s Samsung’s fault. Samsung relies on Google for the software program that powers most of its cellular merchandise and has given up making an attempt to alter that. Units that ran Bada and Tizen weren’t good and had depressing gross sales numbers in comparison with any of Samsung’s more moderen Android-powered units. They had been Samsung’s personal, although, and I want lively improvement and merchandise utilizing them had been nonetheless round. Competitors is nice, ya know?
Google appears to think about Samsung its personal private advertising and marketing division and product showcase division to me. Google did not permit Samsung to have so many Pixel-esque AI options on the S25 as a result of it needed to assist Samsung. It does it as a result of it is aware of Samsung can promote lots of of thousands and thousands of telephones yearly, and it needs folks to have entry to those options so it might acquire extra information. So long as Google stays in management, it does not care that individuals suppose Gemini is a Samsung product. It cares that extra individuals are utilizing it.
Google does this by having two completely different Androids. There may be the Android Open Supply Venture that you just or I can obtain and use on no matter machine we like, making any modifications we would like so long as the open-source licenses are honored. Then there’s the locked-down model of precise Android (sure, the title itself is trademarked) that Google controls with a decent grip. Licensing and platform entry agreements imply if your organization needs to promote a telephone operating Android with entry to any of Google’s software program, you’ll toe their line.
That is the Android that Google makes use of like a carrot on a stick for machine producers. What Google does right here is extraordinarily distasteful to me, nevertheless it means corporations like Samsung or OnePlus do not should develop their very own equal. Although they most likely may. If Amazon can do it, Samsung can do it.
Samsung has grown depending on Google. Some fragments present what Samsung may do, like Good Lock. It appears doubtless Google forces Samsung to forestall the mixing of Good Lock into OneUI, saying it will create some software program fork, and which means you must go to the Galaxy Retailer and set up it like an app.
Merely put, when you consider that Google and Samsung are working collectively to create exclusivity, you are most likely proper. It is a change from the Android of yesteryear, and also you would possibly suppose it is ruining issues — some folks dislike change.
Do not blame Samsung for it as a result of it is 100% Google’s doing.
